El Salvador vs Peru: Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile
El Salvador
0.1573 poorest
in 2022
Peru
0.1709 poorest
in 2022
El Salvador rank
25th
Peru rank
22nd
Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile over time
- El Salvador
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 0.1709 poorest against 0.1573 poorest in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0136 poorest.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 25th and Peru ranks 22nd of 37 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0624 poorest | 0.0621 poorest | 0.0003 poorest | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 0.0505 poorest | 0.0964 poorest | 0.046 poorest | Peru |
| 2020s | 0.1517 poorest | 0.1626 poorest | 0.0109 poorest | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile, El Salvador or Peru?
- Peru, at 0.1709 poorest against 0.1573 poorest in El Salvador as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile between El Salvador and Peru?
- 0.0136 poorest, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Peru?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do El Salvador and Peru rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile?
- El Salvador ranks 25th and Peru ranks 22nd of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in SPL programs (%)