Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic in Viet Nam

Viet Nam: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic was 11.4% in 2020. ▼ Falling

Latest (2020)
11.4%
Change on year
down 35.6%
World rank
31st
of 31 countries
All-time high
19.9%
in 2006
All-time low
8.6%
in 2014
Years of data
6
2006–2020

Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic in Viet Nam, 2006–2020

051015202006201320202006: 19.92010: 10.82012: 11.92014: 8.62018: 17.72020: 11.4

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic in Viet Nam is 11.4%, measured in 2020.

The figure is down 35.6% on the previous year and up 6.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic in Viet Nam peaked at 19.9% in 2006 and was at its lowest, 8.6%, in 2014.

That places Viet Nam 31st out of 31 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic in Viet Nam, year by year

Annual values for Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Viet Nam, 2006 to 2020.
Year Value Change
2006 19.9%
2010 10.8% -46.0%
2012 11.9% +10.5%
2014 8.6% -27.6%
2018 17.7% +106.1%
2020 11.4% -35.6%

Viet Nam compared with similar countries

  • Viet Nam's 11.4% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 22.5%, 51% of the median. (19 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 19.9% 19.9% 19.9% 1
2010s 12.2% 8.6% 17.7% 4
2020s 11.4% 11.4% 11.4% 1

Countries ranked near Viet Nam

  1. 28 Poland 14.6% compare
  2. 29 Burkina Faso 14.4% compare
  3. 30 Pakistan 13.6% compare

See the full ranking of 31 places →

More work & labour data for Viet Nam

All data for Viet Nam →

Frequently asked questions

What is beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic in Viet Nam?
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic in Viet Nam was 11.4% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic recorded in Viet Nam?
The highest recorded value was 19.9% in 2006.
What is the lowest beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic recorded in Viet Nam?
The lowest recorded value was 8.6% in 2014.
How does Viet Nam rank for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic?
Viet Nam ranks 31st out of 31 countries with data for 2020.
Is beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic rising or falling in Viet Nam?
Over the last ten years it is up 6.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Viet Nam data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic in Viet Nam. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-domestic-private-transfers/viet-nam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-domestic-private-transfers/viet-nam/">Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic in Viet Nam</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
31 places, 321 data points, 2003–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population