Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social in Belarus
Belarus: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social was 18.6% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Belarus is 18.6%, measured in 2019.
That represents a change of down 3.9% on the previous year and down 3.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Belarus peaked at 21.1% in 2013 and was at its lowest, 15.9%, in 2016.
That places Belarus 14th out of 37 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social in Belarus, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 16.2% | — |
| 2009 | 19.3% | +19.4% |
| 2010 | 17.4% | -10.0% |
| 2012 | 16.8% | -3.4% |
| 2013 | 21.1% | +25.6% |
| 2014 | 18.1% | -14.1% |
| 2015 | 16.8% | -7.2% |
| 2016 | 15.9% | -5.5% |
| 2017 | 19.6% | +23.2% |
| 2018 | 19.3% | -1.2% |
| 2019 | 18.6% | -3.9% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 18.6% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 9.7%, 1.9× the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Belarus's 18.6% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 21.1%, 88% of the median. (13 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.7% | 16.2% | 19.3% | 2 |
| 2010s | 18.2% | 15.9% | 21.1% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More work & labour data for Belarus
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.12 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.18 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.98 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0716 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 7,566 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,004 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,235 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,116 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 4,351 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Belarus?
- Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Belarus was 18.6% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 21.1% in 2013.
- What is the lowest beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 15.9% in 2016.
- How does Belarus rank for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Belarus ranks 14th out of 37 countries with data for 2019.
- Is beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 3.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population