Belarus vs Mongolia: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Belarus
18.6%
in 2019
Mongolia
18.8%
in 2020
Belarus rank
14th
Mongolia rank
13th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Belarus
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 18.8% against 18.6% in Belarus, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 14th and Mongolia ranks 13th of 37 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.3% | 18.4% | 0.9% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 17.5% | 21.7% | 4.2% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Belarus or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 18.8% against 18.6% in Belarus as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Belarus and Mongolia?
- 0.2%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2018.
- How do Belarus and Mongolia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Belarus ranks 14th and Mongolia ranks 13th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population