Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Viet Nam

Viet Nam: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional was 5.7% in 2020. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2020)
5.7%
Change on year
up 28.1%
World rank
14th
of 26 countries
All-time high
8.3%
in 2010
All-time low
0.7%
in 2014
Years of data
6
2006–2020

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Viet Nam, 2006–2020

024682006201320202006: 6.22010: 8.32012: 2.22014: 0.7272018: 4.52020: 5.7

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Viet Nam recorded 5.7% for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in 2020.

The figure is up 28.1% on the previous year and down 30.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in Viet Nam peaked at 8.3% in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0.7%, in 2014.

That places Viet Nam 14th out of 26 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the middle of the range.

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Viet Nam, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers in Viet Nam, 2006 to 2020.
Year Value Change
2006 6.2%
2010 8.3% +34.6%
2012 2.2% -73.1%
2014 0.7% -67.3%
2018 4.5% +515.8%
2020 5.7% +28.1%

Viet Nam compared with similar countries

  • Viet Nam's 5.7% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 5.7%, 1.0× the median. (18 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 6.2% 6.2% 6.2% 1
2010s 3.9% 0.7% 8.3% 4
2020s 5.7% 5.7% 5.7% 1

Countries ranked near Viet Nam

  1. 11 Romania 7.6% compare
  2. 12 Georgia 7.0% compare
  3. 13 Ukraine 6.2% compare
  4. 15 Argentina 5.7% compare
  5. 16 Costa Rica 4.4% compare
  6. 17 Sri Lanka 3.4% compare

See the full ranking of 26 places →

More work & labour data for Viet Nam

All data for Viet Nam →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in Viet Nam?
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in Viet Nam was 5.7% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Viet Nam?
The highest recorded value was 8.3% in 2010.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Viet Nam?
The lowest recorded value was 0.7% in 2014.
How does Viet Nam rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional?
Viet Nam ranks 14th out of 26 countries with data for 2020.
Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional rising or falling in Viet Nam?
Over the last ten years it is down 30.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Viet Nam data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Viet Nam. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers/viet-nam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers/viet-nam/">Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Viet Nam</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
26 places, 220 data points, 2004–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group