Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Viet Nam

Viet Nam: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International was 16.2% in 2020. ▼ Falling

Latest (2020)
16.2%
World rank
21st
of 27 countries
All-time high
31.4%
in 2010
All-time low
14.0%
in 2012
Years of data
5
2006–2020

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Viet Nam, 2006–2020

01020302006201320202006: 23.32010: 31.42012: 142014: 22.52020: 16.2

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Viet Nam is 16.2%, measured in 2020.

The figure is down 48.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Viet Nam peaked at 31.4% in 2010 and was at its lowest, 14.0%, in 2012.

That places Viet Nam 21st out of 27 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Viet Nam, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban in Viet Nam, 2006 to 2020.
Year Value Change
2006 23.3%
2010 31.4% +34.5%
2012 14.0% -55.2%
2014 22.5% +60.3%
2020 16.2% -28.2%

Viet Nam compared with similar countries

  • Viet Nam's 16.2% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 22.5%, 72% of the median. (17 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 23.3% 23.3% 23.3% 1
2010s 22.6% 14.0% 31.4% 3
2020s 16.2% 16.2% 16.2% 1

Countries ranked near Viet Nam

  1. 18 South Africa 16.7% compare
  2. 19 Serbia 16.6% compare
  3. 20 Peru 16.6% compare
  4. 22 Paraguay 15.2% compare
  5. 23 Colombia 14.7% compare
  6. 24 Costa Rica 14.7% compare

See the full ranking of 27 places →

More work & labour data for Viet Nam

All data for Viet Nam →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Viet Nam?
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Viet Nam was 16.2% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international recorded in Viet Nam?
The highest recorded value was 31.4% in 2010.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international recorded in Viet Nam?
The lowest recorded value was 14.0% in 2012.
How does Viet Nam rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international?
Viet Nam ranks 21st out of 27 countries with data for 2020.
Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international rising or falling in Viet Nam?
Over the last ten years it is down 48.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Viet Nam data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Viet Nam. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-international-private-transfers-urban/viet-nam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-international-private-transfers-urban/viet-nam/">Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Viet Nam</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
27 places, 259 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group