Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Serbia
Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International was 23.0% in 2022. ▼ Falling
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Serbia, 2007–2022
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
In 2022, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Serbia stood at 23.0%. That is the lowest value across all 8 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.2% on the previous year and down 34.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Serbia peaked at 35.1% in 2013 and was at its lowest, 23.0%, in 2022.
That places Serbia 15th out of 27 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Serbia, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 26.2% | — |
| 2010 | 34.3% | +30.7% |
| 2013 | 35.1% | +2.4% |
| 2015 | 25.6% | -27.0% |
| 2018 | 34.3% | +33.8% |
| 2019 | 30.9% | -9.7% |
| 2021 | 23.3% | -24.7% |
| 2022 | 23.0% | -1.2% |
Serbia compared with similar countries
- Serbia's 23.0% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 51.8%, 44% of the median. (8 countries reporting)
- Serbia's 23.0% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 23.5%, 98% of the median. (17 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.2% | 26.2% | 26.2% | 1 |
| 2010s | 32.0% | 25.6% | 35.1% | 5 |
| 2020s | 23.2% | 23.0% | 23.3% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Serbia
- 12 Costa Rica 27.0% compare
- 13 Mexico 26.5% compare
- 14 Dominican Republic 23.5% compare
- 16 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 22.1% compare
- 17 South Africa 21.4% compare
- 18 Viet Nam 21.3% compare
More work & labour data for Serbia
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.7737 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.7205 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.8268 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.14 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.1128 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 5,121 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 2,326 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 1,850 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 1,852 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 3,702 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Serbia?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Serbia was 23.0% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international recorded in Serbia?
- The highest recorded value was 35.1% in 2013.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international recorded in Serbia?
- The lowest recorded value was 23.0% in 2022.
- How does Serbia rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international?
- Serbia ranks 15th out of 27 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international rising or falling in Serbia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 34.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Serbia data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group