Dominican Republic vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International
Dominican Republic
23.5%
in 2021
Serbia
23.0%
in 2022
Dominican Republic rank
14th
Serbia rank
15th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International over time
- Dominican Republic
- Serbia
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 23.5% against 23.0% in Serbia, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 14th and Serbia ranks 15th of 27 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.7% | 26.2% | 1.5% | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 14.8% | 32.0% | 17.2% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 23.5% | 23.3% | 0.2% | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international, Dominican Republic or Serbia?
- Dominican Republic, at 23.5% against 23.0% in Serbia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international between Dominican Republic and Serbia?
- 0.5%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Serbia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2021.
- How do Dominican Republic and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international?
- Dominican Republic ranks 14th and Serbia ranks 15th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group