Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Viet Nam

Viet Nam: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private was 12.7% in 2020. ▬ Flat

Latest (2020)
12.7%
World rank
22nd
of 31 countries
All-time high
30.2%
in 2010
All-time low
6.9%
in 2006
Years of data
5
2006–2020

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Viet Nam, 2006–2020

510152025302006201320202006: 6.92010: 30.22012: 13.92014: 15.52020: 12.7

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2020, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Viet Nam stood at 12.7%.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 57.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Viet Nam peaked at 30.2% in 2010 and was at its lowest, 6.9%, in 2006.

That places Viet Nam 22nd out of 31 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the middle of the range.

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Viet Nam, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban in Viet Nam, 2006 to 2020.
Year Value Change
2006 6.9%
2010 30.2% +336.0%
2012 13.9% -54.0%
2014 15.5% +11.7%
2020 12.7% -18.0%

Viet Nam compared with similar countries

  • Viet Nam's 12.7% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 17.4%, 73% of the median. (19 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 6.9% 6.9% 6.9% 1
2010s 19.9% 13.9% 30.2% 3
2020s 12.7% 12.7% 12.7% 1

Countries ranked near Viet Nam

  1. 19 Malawi 13.6% compare
  2. 20 Chile 13.0% compare
  3. 21 Ecuador 12.8% compare
  4. 23 Mexico 12.6% compare
  5. 24 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 11.8% compare
  6. 25 Peru 11.8% compare

See the full ranking of 31 places →

More work & labour data for Viet Nam

All data for Viet Nam →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Viet Nam?
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Viet Nam was 12.7% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Viet Nam?
The highest recorded value was 30.2% in 2010.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Viet Nam?
The lowest recorded value was 6.9% in 2006.
How does Viet Nam rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private?
Viet Nam ranks 22nd out of 31 countries with data for 2020.
Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private rising or falling in Viet Nam?
Over the last ten years it is down 57.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Viet Nam data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Viet Nam. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-domestic-private-transfers-urban/viet-nam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-domestic-private-transfers-urban/viet-nam/">Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Viet Nam</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
31 places, 316 data points, 2003–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group