Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Viet Nam

Viet Nam: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private was 37.1% in 2020. ▲ Rising

Latest (2020)
37.1%
World rank
5th
of 30 countries
All-time high
37.1%
in 2020
All-time low
11.2%
in 2006
Years of data
5
2006–2020

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Viet Nam, 2006–2020

102030402006201320202006: 11.22010: 31.42012: 232014: 32.72020: 37.1

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2020, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Viet Nam stood at 37.1%. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

The figure is up 18.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Viet Nam peaked at 37.1% in 2020 and was at its lowest, 11.2%, in 2006.

Viet Nam ranks 5th of 30 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Viet Nam, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural in Viet Nam, 2006 to 2020.
Year Value Change
2006 11.2%
2010 31.4% +179.8%
2012 23.0% -26.7%
2014 32.7% +42.0%
2020 37.1% +13.5%

Viet Nam compared with similar countries

  • Viet Nam's 37.1% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 14.0%, 2.7× the median. (18 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 11.2% 11.2% 11.2% 1
2010s 29.0% 23.0% 32.7% 3
2020s 37.1% 37.1% 37.1% 1

Countries ranked near Viet Nam

  1. 2 Kyrgyzstan 55.4% compare
  2. 3 Romania 39.5% compare
  3. 4 Republic of Moldova 38.0% compare
  4. 6 Thailand 35.0% compare
  5. 7 Sri Lanka 22.2% compare
  6. 8 Uruguay 20.7% compare

See the full ranking of 30 places →

More work & labour data for Viet Nam

All data for Viet Nam →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Viet Nam?
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Viet Nam was 37.1% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Viet Nam?
The highest recorded value was 37.1% in 2020.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Viet Nam?
The lowest recorded value was 11.2% in 2006.
How does Viet Nam rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private?
Viet Nam ranks 5th out of 30 countries with data for 2020.
Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private rising or falling in Viet Nam?
Over the last ten years it is up 18.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Viet Nam data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Viet Nam. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-domestic-private-transfers-rural/viet-nam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-domestic-private-transfers-rural/viet-nam/">Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Viet Nam</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
30 places, 295 data points, 2003–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group