Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social in Poland
Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social was 49.8% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social in Poland, 2005–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social in Poland is 49.8%, measured in 2019.
The figure is down 4.8% on the previous year and up 8.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social in Poland peaked at 59.9% in 2015 and was at its lowest, 44.1%, in 2008.
Poland ranks 3rd of 36 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social in Poland, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 49.8% | — |
| 2006 | 50.5% | +1.4% |
| 2007 | 45.5% | -9.9% |
| 2008 | 44.1% | -3.0% |
| 2009 | 45.9% | +4.0% |
| 2010 | 48.8% | +6.4% |
| 2011 | 50.4% | +3.2% |
| 2012 | 53.0% | +5.3% |
| 2015 | 59.9% | +12.9% |
| 2016 | 53.4% | -10.9% |
| 2017 | 52.3% | -1.9% |
| 2019 | 49.8% | -4.8% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 49.8% is above the median for high income countries, which is 40.3%, 1.2× the median. (6 countries reporting)
- Poland's 49.8% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 41.3%, 1.2× the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.2% | 44.1% | 50.5% | 5 |
| 2010s | 52.5% | 48.8% | 59.9% | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
- 1 Thailand 78.4% compare
- 2 Serbia 51.0% compare
- 4 Moldova 47.0% compare
- 5 South Africa 46.9% compare
- 6 Kazakhstan 46.5% compare
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social in Poland?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social in Poland was 49.8% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 59.9% in 2015.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 44.1% in 2008.
- How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social?
- Poland ranks 3rd out of 36 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 8.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group