Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social was 46.5% in 2021. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social in Kazakhstan, 2007–2021
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2021, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social in Kazakhstan stood at 46.5%.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 5.4% on the previous year and up 171.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social in Kazakhstan peaked at 49.2% in 2020 and was at its lowest, 6.3%, in 2007.
That places Kazakhstan 6th out of 36 countries with data for 2021, putting it in the top quarter.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 6.3% | — |
| 2010 | 17.1% | +170.6% |
| 2014 | 29.1% | +69.9% |
| 2015 | 42.9% | +47.8% |
| 2017 | 44.4% | +3.4% |
| 2018 | 44.3% | -0.2% |
| 2019 | 48.2% | +8.8% |
| 2020 | 49.2% | +1.9% |
| 2021 | 46.5% | -5.4% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's 46.5% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 32.7%, 1.4× the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Kazakhstan's 46.5% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 41.3%, 1.1× the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.3% | 6.3% | 6.3% | 1 |
| 2010s | 37.7% | 17.1% | 48.2% | 6 |
| 2020s | 47.8% | 46.5% | 49.2% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
- 3 Poland 49.8% compare
- 4 Moldova 47.0% compare
- 5 South Africa 46.9% compare
- 7 Romania 45.2% compare
- 8 Kyrgyzstan 43.4% compare
- 9 Costa Rica 41.6% compare
More work & labour data for Kazakhstan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.2152 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.2212 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.2086 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.02 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.25 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 15,866 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 7,093 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 16,815 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 16,857 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 33,672 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social in Kazakhstan?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social in Kazakhstan was 46.5% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 49.2% in 2020.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 6.3% in 2007.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social?
- Kazakhstan ranks 6th out of 36 countries with data for 2021.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 171.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group