Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Brazil
Brazil: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social was 38.8% in 2022. ▼ Falling
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Brazil, 2006–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Brazil recorded 38.8% for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in 2022. That is the lowest value across all 12 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 4.2% on the previous year and down 6.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Brazil peaked at 44.8% in 2015 and was at its lowest, 38.8%, in 2022.
That places Brazil 17th out of 34 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 12 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Brazil, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 43.8% | — |
| 2009 | 44.0% | +0.4% |
| 2011 | 44.0% | +0.1% |
| 2012 | 41.5% | -5.7% |
| 2015 | 44.8% | +7.9% |
| 2016 | 39.1% | -12.6% |
| 2017 | 39.3% | +0.4% |
| 2018 | 39.7% | +1.0% |
| 2019 | 40.7% | +2.7% |
| 2020 | 41.3% | +1.4% |
| 2021 | 40.5% | -1.9% |
| 2022 | 38.8% | -4.2% |
Brazil compared with similar countries
- Brazil's 38.8% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 38.7%, 1.0× the median. (22 countries reporting)
- Brazil's 38.8% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 35.9%, 1.1× the median. (15 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.9% | 43.8% | 44.0% | 2 |
| 2010s | 41.3% | 39.1% | 44.8% | 7 |
| 2020s | 40.2% | 38.8% | 41.3% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
More work & labour data for Brazil
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.7328 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.7065 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.7581 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.74 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.1001 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 215,063 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 17,625 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 82,304 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 81,060 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 163,364 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Brazil?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Brazil was 38.8% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 44.8% in 2015.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was 38.8% in 2022.
- How does Brazil rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social?
- Brazil ranks 17th out of 34 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is down 6.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Insurance. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group