Brazil vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social
Brazil
38.8%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
38.2%
in 2020
Brazil rank
17th
Kyrgyzstan rank
20th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social over time
- Brazil
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 38.8% against 38.2% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 17th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 20th of 34 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.8% | 23.0% | 20.8% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 41.3% | 38.1% | 3.2% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 41.3% | 38.2% | 3.1% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social, Brazil or Kyrgyzstan?
- Brazil, at 38.8% against 38.2% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social between Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.6%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social?
- Brazil ranks 17th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 20th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Insurance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group