Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Poland
Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social was 8.0% in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Poland, 2005–2019
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
In 2019, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Poland stood at 8.0%. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.
The figure is up 99.7% on the previous year and up 275.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Poland peaked at 8.0% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 2.1%, in 2008.
That places Poland 8th out of 35 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Poland, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 2.6% | — |
| 2006 | 2.6% | +1.3% |
| 2007 | 2.3% | -11.7% |
| 2008 | 2.1% | -10.7% |
| 2009 | 2.1% | +3.1% |
| 2010 | 2.2% | +5.6% |
| 2011 | 2.1% | -4.1% |
| 2012 | 2.3% | +5.7% |
| 2015 | 2.8% | +22.8% |
| 2016 | 3.0% | +6.5% |
| 2017 | 4.0% | +34.4% |
| 2019 | 8.0% | +99.7% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 8.0% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 7.7%, 1.0× the median. (12 countries reporting)
- Poland's 8.0% is above the median for high income countries, which is 5.1%, 1.5× the median. (6 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.3% | 2.1% | 2.6% | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.5% | 2.1% | 8.0% | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Poland?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Poland was 8.0% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 8.0% in 2019.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.1% in 2008.
- How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social?
- Poland ranks 8th out of 35 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 275.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Assistance (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group