Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Brazil
Brazil: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social was 8.5% in 2022. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Brazil, 2009–2022
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Brazil is 8.5%, measured in 2022.
The figure is up 65.5% on the previous year and up 297.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Brazil peaked at 10.4% in 2020 and was at its lowest, 2.0%, in 2011.
Brazil ranks 6th of 35 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Brazil, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 2.3% | — |
| 2011 | 2.0% | -13.1% |
| 2012 | 2.1% | +6.5% |
| 2015 | 3.8% | +80.0% |
| 2016 | 7.9% | +106.9% |
| 2017 | 7.5% | -4.9% |
| 2018 | 7.7% | +3.0% |
| 2019 | 9.0% | +16.5% |
| 2020 | 10.4% | +15.1% |
| 2021 | 5.1% | -50.8% |
| 2022 | 8.5% | +65.5% |
Brazil compared with similar countries
- Brazil's 8.5% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.8%, 2.3× the median. (23 countries reporting)
- Brazil's 8.5% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 2.5%, 3.3× the median. (15 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.3% | 2.3% | 2.3% | 1 |
| 2010s | 5.7% | 2.0% | 9.0% | 7 |
| 2020s | 8.0% | 5.1% | 10.4% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
- 4 Kyrgyzstan 9.7% compare
- 5 Kazakhstan 9.5% compare
- 7 Serbia 8.3% compare
- 8 Poland 8.0% compare
- 9 Armenia 7.4% compare
More work & labour data for Brazil
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.7328 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.7065 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.7581 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.74 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.1001 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 215,063 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 17,625 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 82,304 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 81,060 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 163,364 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Brazil?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Brazil was 8.5% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 10.4% in 2020.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.0% in 2011.
- How does Brazil rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social?
- Brazil ranks 6th out of 35 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is up 297.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Assistance (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group