Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Poland
Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers was 5,295.3% in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Poland, 2005–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2019, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Poland stood at 5,295.3%. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.
That represents a change of up 70,698.2% on the previous year and up 54,523.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Poland peaked at 5,295.3% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 7.5%, in 2017.
That places Poland 1st out of 30 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Poland, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 13.1% | — |
| 2006 | 10.9% | -16.3% |
| 2007 | 10.6% | -3.5% |
| 2008 | 9.8% | -7.0% |
| 2009 | 9.7% | -1.3% |
| 2010 | 11.2% | +15.3% |
| 2011 | 9.9% | -11.3% |
| 2012 | 10.6% | +6.8% |
| 2015 | 8.8% | -16.7% |
| 2016 | 7.8% | -11.1% |
| 2017 | 7.5% | -4.6% |
| 2019 | 5,295.3% | +70698.2% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 5,295.3% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 26.9%, 197.0× the median. (9 countries reporting)
- Poland's 5,295.3% is above the median for high income countries, which is 15.3%, 345.9× the median. (6 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.8% | 9.7% | 13.1% | 5 |
| 2010s | 764.5% | 7.5% | 5,295.3% | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Poland?
- Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Poland was 5,295.3% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 5,295.3% in 2019.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 7.5% in 2017.
- How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers?
- Poland ranks 1st out of 30 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 54,523.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group