Adequacy of benefits: Domestic Private … 4th Domestic rural in Moldova

Moldova: Adequacy of benefits: Domestic Private … 4th Domestic rural was 43.7% in 2018. ▼ Falling

Latest (2018)
43.7%
Change on year
up 41.5%
World rank
3rd
of 30 countries
All-time high
48.3%
in 2013
All-time low
30.9%
in 2017
Years of data
5
2010–2018

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Moldova, 2010–2018

010203040502010201420182010: 43.52012: 39.12013: 48.32017: 30.92018: 43.7

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Moldova is 43.7%, measured in 2018.

That represents a change of up 41.5% on the previous year and up 0.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Moldova peaked at 48.3% in 2013 and was at its lowest, 30.9%, in 2017.

Moldova ranks 3rd of 30 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Adequacy of benefits: Domestic Private … 4th Domestic rural in Moldova, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural in Moldova, 2010 to 2018.
Year Value Change
2010 43.5% —
2012 39.1% -10.2%
2013 48.3% +23.5%
2017 30.9% -36.0%
2018 43.7% +41.5%

Moldova compared with similar countries

  • Moldova's 43.7% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 26.9%, 1.6× the median. (9 countries reporting)
  • Moldova's 43.7% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 17.6%, 2.5× the median. (18 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Moldova

  1. 1 Poland 5,295.3% compare
  2. 2 Vietnam 45.1% compare
  3. 4 Thailand 41.3% compare
  4. 5 Kyrgyzstan 40.5% compare
  5. 6 Sri Lanka 31.4% compare

See the full ranking of 30 places →

More work & labour data for Moldova

All data for Moldova →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Moldova?
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Moldova was 43.7% in 2018, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Moldova?
The highest recorded value was 48.3% in 2013.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Moldova?
The lowest recorded value was 30.9% in 2017.
How does Moldova rank for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers?
Moldova ranks 3rd out of 30 countries with data for 2018.
Is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers rising or falling in Moldova?
Over the last ten years it is up 0.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Moldova data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Moldova. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-domestic-private-transfers-rural/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-domestic-private-transfers-rural/moldova/">Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Moldova</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
30 places, 295 data points, 2003–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group