Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Belarus
Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and was 50.2% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2019, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and in Belarus stood at 50.2%.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.0% on the previous year and up 54.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and in Belarus peaked at 60.0% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 31.6%, in 2008.
Belarus ranks 8th of 36 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Belarus, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 31.6% | — |
| 2009 | 32.5% | +2.7% |
| 2010 | 32.3% | -0.5% |
| 2012 | 37.2% | +15.2% |
| 2013 | 41.6% | +11.7% |
| 2014 | 47.1% | +13.2% |
| 2015 | 44.8% | -4.8% |
| 2016 | 60.0% | +33.9% |
| 2017 | 48.8% | -18.8% |
| 2018 | 49.2% | +0.9% |
| 2019 | 50.2% | +2.0% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 50.2% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 32.1%, 1.6× the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Belarus's 50.2% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 48.7%, 1.0× the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.0% | 31.6% | 32.5% | 2 |
| 2010s | 45.7% | 32.3% | 60.0% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 5 Romania 56.7% compare
- 6 Kazakhstan 54.8% compare
- 7 Türkiye 51.2% compare
- 9 Kyrgyzstan 47.2% compare
- 10 Republic of Moldova 46.6% compare
- 11 Ukraine 42.9% compare
More work & labour data for Belarus
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.12 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.18 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.98 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0716 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 7,566 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,004 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,235 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,116 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 4,351 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and in Belarus?
- Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and in Belarus was 50.2% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 60.0% in 2016.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 31.6% in 2008.
- How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and?
- Belarus ranks 8th out of 36 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 54.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group