Belarus vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and
Belarus
50.2%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan
47.2%
in 2020
Belarus rank
8th
Kyrgyzstan rank
9th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and over time
- Belarus
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 50.2% against 47.2% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 3.0%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 8th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 9th of 36 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and, Belarus or Kyrgyzstan?
- Belarus, at 50.2% against 47.2% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and between Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 3.0%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and?
- Belarus ranks 8th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 9th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group