Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban was 48.0% in 2020. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban in Kyrgyzstan, 2006–2020
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2020, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban in Kyrgyzstan stood at 48.0%.
The figure is down 0.3% on the previous year and up 64.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 58.5% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 29.2%, in 2011.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 12th of 34 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 34.8% | — |
| 2011 | 29.2% | -16.2% |
| 2012 | 35.4% | +21.4% |
| 2013 | 38.7% | +9.2% |
| 2014 | 55.8% | +44.3% |
| 2015 | 55.7% | -0.1% |
| 2016 | 58.5% | +4.9% |
| 2017 | 56.6% | -3.2% |
| 2018 | 47.8% | -15.6% |
| 2019 | 48.2% | +0.8% |
| 2020 | 48.0% | -0.3% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's 48.0% is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 39.5%, 1.2× the median. (5 countries reporting)
- Kyrgyzstan's 48.0% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 55.1%, 87% of the median. (11 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.8% | 34.8% | 34.8% | 1 |
| 2010s | 47.3% | 29.2% | 58.5% | 9 |
| 2020s | 48.0% | 48.0% | 48.0% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
More work & labour data for Kyrgyzstan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.0196 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.0278 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.0124 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -0.8283 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.79 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 4,346 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 3,767 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 5,899 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 5,831 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 11,730 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban in Kyrgyzstan?
- Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban in Kyrgyzstan was 48.0% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 58.5% in 2016.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 29.2% in 2011.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 12th out of 34 countries with data for 2020.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 64.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group