Kyrgyzstan vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban
Kyrgyzstan
48.0%
in 2020
Mongolia
48.4%
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
12th
Mongolia rank
11th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 48.4% against 48.0% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 12th and Mongolia ranks 11th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 45.3% | 31.0% | 14.3% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 48.0% | 48.4% | 0.4% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban, Kyrgyzstan or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 48.4% against 48.0% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban between Kyrgyzstan and Mongolia?
- 0.4%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 12th and Mongolia ranks 11th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group