Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Poland
Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural was 70.6% in 2019. ▼ Falling
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Poland, 2005–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2019, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Poland stood at 70.6%. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.
That represents a change of up 36.0% on the previous year and up 11.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Poland peaked at 70.6% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 51.9%, in 2017.
Poland ranks 4th of 31 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 12 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Poland, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 68.3% | — |
| 2006 | 69.0% | +1.0% |
| 2007 | 65.6% | -5.0% |
| 2008 | 61.9% | -5.5% |
| 2009 | 63.2% | +2.0% |
| 2010 | 64.7% | +2.5% |
| 2011 | 64.3% | -0.6% |
| 2012 | 64.3% | -0.0% |
| 2015 | 65.5% | +1.8% |
| 2016 | 64.7% | -1.3% |
| 2017 | 51.9% | -19.7% |
| 2019 | 70.6% | +36.0% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 70.6% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 48.5%, 1.5× the median. (11 countries reporting)
- Poland's 70.6% is above the median for high income countries, which is 48.7%, 1.4× the median. (6 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.6% | 61.9% | 69.0% | 5 |
| 2010s | 63.7% | 51.9% | 70.6% | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Poland?
- Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Poland was 70.6% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 70.6% in 2019.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 51.9% in 2017.
- How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Poland ranks 4th out of 31 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 11.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group