Mongolia vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural
Mongolia
58.0%
in 2020
Poland
70.6%
in 2019
Mongolia rank
7th
Poland rank
4th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural over time
- Mongolia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 70.6% against 58.0% in Mongolia, a difference of 12.6%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.2 times Mongolia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 7th and Poland ranks 4th of 31 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.1% | 64.4% | 35.3% | Poland |
| 2010s | 32.2% | 64.5% | 32.3% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural, Mongolia or Poland?
- Poland, at 70.6% against 58.0% in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural between Mongolia and Poland?
- 12.6%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Poland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Mongolia and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Mongolia ranks 7th and Poland ranks 4th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group