Adequacy of benefits: International … 3rd International urban in Vietnam

Vietnam: Adequacy of benefits: International … 3rd International urban was 26.8% in 2020. ▼ Falling

Latest (2020)
26.8%
World rank
14th
of 27 countries
All-time high
30.1%
in 2006
All-time low
26.4%
in 2010
Years of data
5
2006–2020

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private in Vietnam, 2006–2020

01020302006201320202006: 30.12010: 26.42012: 28.22014: 28.22020: 26.8

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Vietnam recorded 26.8% for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private in 2020.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private in Vietnam peaked at 30.1% in 2006 and was at its lowest, 26.4%, in 2010.

That places Vietnam 14th out of 27 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the middle of the range.

Adequacy of benefits: International … 3rd International urban in Vietnam, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban in Vietnam, 2006 to 2020.
Year Value Change
2006 30.1% —
2010 26.4% -12.1%
2012 28.2% +6.7%
2014 28.2% -0.1%
2020 26.8% -5.0%

Vietnam compared with similar countries

  • Vietnam's 26.8% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 28.1%, 95% of the median. (17 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 30.1% 30.1% 30.1% 1
2010s 27.6% 26.4% 28.2% 3
2020s 26.8% 26.8% 26.8% 1

Countries ranked near Vietnam

  1. 11 South Africa 39.9% compare
  2. 12 Turkey 28.7% compare
  3. 13 Serbia 28.1% compare
  4. 15 Dominican Republic 24.2% compare
  5. 16 Mexico 23.6% compare
  6. 17 Bolivia 21.2% compare

See the full ranking of 27 places →

More work & labour data for Vietnam

All data for Vietnam →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private in Vietnam?
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private in Vietnam was 26.8% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private recorded in Vietnam?
The highest recorded value was 30.1% in 2006.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private recorded in Vietnam?
The lowest recorded value was 26.4% in 2010.
How does Vietnam rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private?
Vietnam ranks 14th out of 27 countries with data for 2020.
Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - international private rising or falling in Vietnam?
Over the last ten years it is up 1.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Vietnam data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private in Vietnam. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-international-private-transfers-urban/viet-nam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-international-private-transfers-urban/viet-nam/">Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private in Vietnam</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
27 places, 259 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group