Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Honduras
Honduras: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers was 21.0% in 2019. ▼ Falling
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Honduras, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
Honduras recorded 21.0% for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in 2019.
That represents a change of up 4.9% on the previous year and down 4.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Honduras peaked at 22.7% in 2013 and was at its lowest, 17.8%, in 2016.
That places Honduras 11th out of 31 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 10 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Honduras, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 20.8% | — |
| 2009 | 22.0% | +5.6% |
| 2010 | 22.3% | +1.4% |
| 2011 | 20.8% | -6.7% |
| 2013 | 22.7% | +9.5% |
| 2015 | 19.3% | -15.2% |
| 2016 | 17.8% | -7.8% |
| 2017 | 19.0% | +6.9% |
| 2018 | 20.0% | +5.2% |
| 2019 | 21.0% | +4.9% |
Honduras compared with similar countries
- Honduras's 21.0% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 16.2%, 1.3× the median. (15 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.4% | 20.8% | 22.0% | 2 |
| 2010s | 20.4% | 17.8% | 22.7% | 8 |
Countries ranked near Honduras
- 8 Armenia 28.7% compare
- 9 Mongolia 22.7% compare
- 10 Dominican Republic 21.8% compare
- 12 Kazakhstan 20.5% compare
- 13 Argentina 20.3% compare
- 14 Costa Rica 19.1% compare
More work & labour data for Honduras
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.1079 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.0917 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.1244 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.03 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.17 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 9,793 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 3,456 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 8,495 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 8,535 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 17,030 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Honduras?
- Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Honduras was 21.0% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Honduras?
- The highest recorded value was 22.7% in 2013.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Honduras?
- The lowest recorded value was 17.8% in 2016.
- How does Honduras rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers?
- Honduras ranks 11th out of 31 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers rising or falling in Honduras?
- Over the last ten years it is down 4.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Honduras data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group