Dominican Republic vs Honduras: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers
Dominican Republic
21.8%
in 2021
Honduras
21.0%
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
10th
Honduras rank
11th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers over time
- Dominican Republic
- Honduras
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 21.8% against 21.0% in Honduras, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Honduras ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 10th and Honduras ranks 11th of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Honduras in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.5% | 21.4% | 0.8% | Honduras |
| 2010s | 21.0% | 20.4% | 0.6% | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers, Dominican Republic or Honduras?
- Dominican Republic, at 21.8% against 21.0% in Honduras as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers between Dominican Republic and Honduras?
- 0.8%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Honduras?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Dominican Republic and Honduras rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers?
- Dominican Republic ranks 10th and Honduras ranks 11th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group