Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and was 40.9% in 2020. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Kyrgyzstan, 2006–2020
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Kyrgyzstan recorded 40.9% for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and in 2020.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 2.6% on the previous year and up 18.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 42.8% in 2013 and was at its lowest, 33.1%, in 2006.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th of 37 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 33.1% | — |
| 2011 | 34.6% | +4.7% |
| 2012 | 39.5% | +14.3% |
| 2013 | 42.8% | +8.3% |
| 2014 | 42.7% | -0.3% |
| 2015 | 41.7% | -2.4% |
| 2016 | 41.4% | -0.6% |
| 2017 | 42.6% | +3.0% |
| 2018 | 42.8% | +0.3% |
| 2019 | 42.0% | -1.7% |
| 2020 | 40.9% | -2.6% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's 40.9% is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 18.3%, 2.2× the median. (5 countries reporting)
- Kyrgyzstan's 40.9% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 49.6%, 83% of the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.1% | 33.1% | 33.1% | 1 |
| 2010s | 41.1% | 34.6% | 42.8% | 9 |
| 2020s | 40.9% | 40.9% | 40.9% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
More work & labour data for Kyrgyzstan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.0196 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.0278 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.0124 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -0.8283 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.79 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 4,346 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 3,767 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 5,899 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 5,831 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 11,730 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Kyrgyzstan?
- Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Kyrgyzstan was 40.9% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 42.8% in 2013.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 33.1% in 2006.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th out of 37 countries with data for 2020.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 18.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group