Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and
Chile
32.9%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
40.9%
in 2020
Chile rank
16th
Kyrgyzstan rank
14th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and over time
- Chile
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 40.9% against 32.9% in Chile, a difference of 8.0%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 16th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th of 37 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.6% | 33.1% | 13.5% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 16.5% | 40.4% | 23.9% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 24.3% | 40.9% | 16.6% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and, Chile or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 40.9% against 32.9% in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and between Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 8.0%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and?
- Chile ranks 16th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group