Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Brazil
Brazil: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural was 62.9% in 2022. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Brazil, 2006–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Brazil recorded 62.9% for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in 2022.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.2% on the previous year and up 12.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Brazil peaked at 67.5% in 2017 and was at its lowest, 54.3%, in 2006.
That places Brazil 8th out of 31 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Brazil, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 54.3% | — |
| 2009 | 55.9% | +2.9% |
| 2011 | 56.0% | +0.2% |
| 2012 | 56.1% | +0.2% |
| 2015 | 56.6% | +0.9% |
| 2016 | 65.7% | +16.1% |
| 2017 | 67.5% | +2.8% |
| 2018 | 67.4% | -0.2% |
| 2019 | 66.6% | -1.1% |
| 2020 | 54.9% | -17.6% |
| 2021 | 62.7% | +14.4% |
| 2022 | 62.9% | +0.2% |
Brazil compared with similar countries
- Brazil's 62.9% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 49.9%, 1.3× the median. (20 countries reporting)
- Brazil's 62.9% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 43.3%, 1.5× the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.1% | 54.3% | 55.9% | 2 |
| 2010s | 62.2% | 56.0% | 67.5% | 7 |
| 2020s | 60.2% | 54.9% | 62.9% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
More work & labour data for Brazil
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.7328 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.7065 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.7581 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.74 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.1001 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 215,063 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 17,625 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 82,304 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 81,060 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 163,364 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Brazil?
- Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Brazil was 62.9% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 67.5% in 2017.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was 54.3% in 2006.
- How does Brazil rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Brazil ranks 8th out of 31 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is up 12.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group