Brazil vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural
Brazil
62.9%
in 2022
Serbia
55.8%
in 2022
Brazil rank
8th
Serbia rank
10th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural over time
- Brazil
- Serbia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 62.9% against 55.8% in Serbia, a difference of 7.1%.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 8th and Serbia ranks 10th of 31 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 63.5% | 49.2% | 14.3% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 62.8% | 56.1% | 6.7% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural, Brazil or Serbia?
- Brazil, at 62.9% against 55.8% in Serbia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural between Brazil and Serbia?
- 7.1%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2022.
- How do Brazil and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Brazil ranks 8th and Serbia ranks 10th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group