Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Poland

Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash was 30.3% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
30.3%
Change on year
up 81.2%
World rank
2nd
of 26 countries
All-time high
30.3%
in 2019
All-time low
13.6%
in 2009
Years of data
12
2005–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Poland, 2005–2019

01020302005201220192005: 13.92006: 13.82007: 14.12008: 13.62009: 13.62010: 15.32011: 15.72012: 162015: 18.22016: 16.12017: 16.72019: 30.3

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Poland recorded 30.3% for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in 2019. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

That represents a change of up 81.2% on the previous year and up 122.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Poland peaked at 30.3% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 13.6%, in 2009.

That places Poland 2nd out of 26 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Poland, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers in Poland, 2005 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2005 13.9%
2006 13.8% -0.5%
2007 14.1% +2.1%
2008 13.6% -3.4%
2009 13.6% -0.1%
2010 15.3% +11.9%
2011 15.7% +3.0%
2012 16.0% +1.6%
2015 18.2% +13.9%
2016 16.1% -11.4%
2017 16.7% +3.8%
2019 30.3% +81.2%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 13.8% 13.6% 14.1% 5
2010s 18.3% 15.3% 30.3% 7

Countries ranked near Poland

  1. 1 Georgia 32.1% compare
  2. 3 Belarus 27.6% compare
  3. 4 Armenia 27.3% compare
  4. 5 Kosovo 23.2% compare
  5. 5 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 23.2% compare

See the full ranking of 26 places →

More work & labour data for Poland

All data for Poland →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Poland?
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Poland was 30.3% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Poland?
The highest recorded value was 30.3% in 2019.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Poland?
The lowest recorded value was 13.6% in 2009.
How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
Poland ranks 2nd out of 26 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash rising or falling in Poland?
Over the last ten years it is up 122.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Poland data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Poland. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers/poland/">Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Poland</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
26 places, 222 data points, 2004–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group