Belarus vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash
Belarus
27.6%
in 2019
Poland
30.3%
in 2019
Belarus rank
3rd
Poland rank
2nd
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash over time
- Belarus
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 30.3% against 27.6% in Belarus, a difference of 2.7%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Poland ahead.
Belarus ranks 3rd and Poland ranks 2nd of 26 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.7% | 13.6% | 0.9% | Poland |
| 2010s | 36.9% | 18.8% | 18.2% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash, Belarus or Poland?
- Poland, at 30.3% against 27.6% in Belarus as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash between Belarus and Poland?
- 2.7%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Poland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
- Belarus ranks 3rd and Poland ranks 2nd of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group