Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash was 18.4% in 2020. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Kyrgyzstan, 2006–2020
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Kyrgyzstan is 18.4%, measured in 2020.
That represents a change of up 0.3% on the previous year and up 96.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 21.3% in 2017 and was at its lowest, 8.9%, in 2006.
That places Kyrgyzstan 8th out of 26 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 8.9% | — |
| 2011 | 9.4% | +4.9% |
| 2012 | 10.4% | +11.2% |
| 2013 | 12.6% | +21.1% |
| 2014 | 11.9% | -5.6% |
| 2015 | 13.1% | +9.9% |
| 2016 | 16.0% | +22.1% |
| 2017 | 21.3% | +33.2% |
| 2018 | 19.1% | -10.1% |
| 2019 | 18.3% | -4.2% |
| 2020 | 18.4% | +0.3% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's 18.4% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 18.8%, 98% of the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.9% | 8.9% | 8.9% | 1 |
| 2010s | 14.7% | 9.4% | 21.3% | 9 |
| 2020s | 18.4% | 18.4% | 18.4% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
- 5 Kosovo 23.2% compare
- 5 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 23.2% compare
- 7 Serbia 19.2% compare
- 9 Kazakhstan 18.2% compare
- 10 Romania 17.6% compare
- 11 Republic of Moldova 15.1% compare
More work & labour data for Kyrgyzstan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.0196 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.0278 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.0124 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -0.8283 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.79 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 4,346 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 3,767 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 5,899 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 5,831 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 11,730 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Kyrgyzstan?
- Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Kyrgyzstan was 18.4% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 21.3% in 2017.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 8.9% in 2006.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 8th out of 26 countries with data for 2020.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 96.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group