Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
23.2%
in 2017
Kyrgyzstan
18.4%
in 2020
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
5th
Kyrgyzstan rank
8th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash over time
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) currently reports 23.2% against 18.4% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 4.8%.
That makes Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)'s figure about 1.3 times Kyrgyzstan's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) has been ahead every year.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 5th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 8th of 26 countries.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.6% | 8.9% | 23.7% | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
| 2010s | 22.1% | 13.4% | 8.7% | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), at 23.2% against 18.4% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2017.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash between Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Kyrgyzstan?
- 4.8%, with Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 5th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 8th of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group