Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Serbia
Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash was 17.9% in 2022. ▲ Rising
Latest (2022)
17.9%
Change on year
down 4.9%
World rank
7th
of 25 countries
All-time high
19.5%
in 2018
All-time low
9.5%
in 2007
Years of data
8
2007–2022
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Serbia, 2007–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2022, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Serbia stood at 17.9%.
The figure is down 4.9% on the previous year and up 18.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Serbia peaked at 19.5% in 2018 and was at its lowest, 9.5%, in 2007.
Serbia ranks 7th of 25 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Serbia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 9.5% | — |
| 2010 | 13.3% | +41.1% |
| 2013 | 15.1% | +13.3% |
| 2015 | 16.5% | +9.0% |
| 2018 | 19.5% | +18.7% |
| 2019 | 13.6% | -30.5% |
| 2021 | 18.8% | +38.5% |
| 2022 | 17.9% | -4.9% |
Serbia compared with similar countries
- Serbia's 17.9% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 17.8%, 1.0× the median. (12 countries reporting)
- Serbia's 17.9% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 10.3%, 1.7× the median. (17 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.5% | 9.5% | 9.5% | 1 |
| 2010s | 15.6% | 13.3% | 19.5% | 5 |
| 2020s | 18.4% | 17.9% | 18.8% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Serbia
- 4 Georgia 27.3% compare
- 5 Poland 26.3% compare
- 6 Armenia 26.0% compare
- 8 Kyrgyzstan 17.7% compare
- 9 Republic of Moldova 17.3% compare
- 10 Kazakhstan 16.7% compare
More work & labour data for Serbia
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.7737 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.7205 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.8268 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.14 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.1128 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 5,121 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 2,326 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 1,850 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 1,852 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 3,702 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Serbia?
- Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Serbia was 17.9% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Serbia?
- The highest recorded value was 19.5% in 2018.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Serbia?
- The lowest recorded value was 9.5% in 2007.
- How does Serbia rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
- Serbia ranks 7th out of 25 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash rising or falling in Serbia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 18.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Serbia data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group