Kazakhstan vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash
Kazakhstan
16.7%
in 2021
Serbia
17.9%
in 2022
Kazakhstan rank
10th
Serbia rank
7th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash over time
- Kazakhstan
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 17.9% against 16.7% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 1.2%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Serbia ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 10th and Serbia ranks 7th of 25 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 10.1% | 15.7% | 5.7% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 16.7% | 18.8% | 2.1% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash, Kazakhstan or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 17.9% against 16.7% in Kazakhstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash between Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 1.2%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Kazakhstan and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
- Kazakhstan ranks 10th and Serbia ranks 7th of 25 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group