Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Serbia
Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash was 22.4% in 2022. ▲ Rising
Latest (2022)
22.4%
Change on year
down 28.9%
World rank
7th
of 24 countries
All-time high
31.5%
in 2021
All-time low
11.6%
in 2007
Years of data
8
2007–2022
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Serbia, 2007–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Serbia recorded 22.4% for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in 2022.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 28.9% on the previous year and up 59.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Serbia peaked at 31.5% in 2021 and was at its lowest, 11.6%, in 2007.
Serbia ranks 7th of 24 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Serbia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 11.6% | — |
| 2010 | 15.1% | +30.8% |
| 2013 | 14.0% | -7.6% |
| 2015 | 18.1% | +29.6% |
| 2018 | 18.1% | -0.5% |
| 2019 | 19.1% | +5.7% |
| 2021 | 31.5% | +65.1% |
| 2022 | 22.4% | -28.9% |
Serbia compared with similar countries
- Serbia's 22.4% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 20.9%, 1.1× the median. (12 countries reporting)
- Serbia's 22.4% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 14.0%, 1.6× the median. (16 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.6% | 11.6% | 11.6% | 1 |
| 2010s | 16.9% | 14.0% | 19.1% | 5 |
| 2020s | 26.9% | 22.4% | 31.5% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Serbia
- 4 Armenia 32.2% compare
- 5 Kosovo 23.6% compare
- 5 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 23.6% compare
- 8 Costa Rica 21.0% compare
- 9 Kazakhstan 19.3% compare
- 10 Kyrgyzstan 19.2% compare
More work & labour data for Serbia
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.7737 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.7205 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.8268 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.14 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.1128 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 5,121 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 2,326 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 1,850 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 1,852 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 3,702 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Serbia?
- Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Serbia was 22.4% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Serbia?
- The highest recorded value was 31.5% in 2021.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Serbia?
- The lowest recorded value was 11.6% in 2007.
- How does Serbia rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
- Serbia ranks 7th out of 24 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash rising or falling in Serbia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 59.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Serbia data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group