Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash was 19.3% in 2021. ◆ Volatile
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Kazakhstan, 2007–2021
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Kazakhstan is 19.3%, measured in 2021.
That represents a change of up 0.6% on the previous year and up 508.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Kazakhstan peaked at 40.3% in 2014 and was at its lowest, 2.9%, in 2007.
That places Kazakhstan 9th out of 24 countries with data for 2021, putting it in the middle of the range.
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 2.9% | — |
| 2010 | 3.2% | +9.2% |
| 2014 | 40.3% | +1166.8% |
| 2015 | 7.2% | -82.1% |
| 2017 | 11.1% | +53.7% |
| 2018 | 12.2% | +9.9% |
| 2019 | 18.3% | +50.4% |
| 2020 | 19.2% | +4.8% |
| 2021 | 19.3% | +0.6% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's 19.3% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 20.9%, 93% of the median. (12 countries reporting)
- Kazakhstan's 19.3% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 14.0%, 1.4× the median. (16 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.9% | 2.9% | 2.9% | 1 |
| 2010s | 15.4% | 3.2% | 40.3% | 6 |
| 2020s | 19.3% | 19.2% | 19.3% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
- 7 Serbia 22.4% compare
- 8 Costa Rica 21.0% compare
- 10 Kyrgyzstan 19.2% compare
- 11 Romania 18.7% compare
- 12 Moldova 16.5% compare
More work & labour data for Kazakhstan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.2152 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.2212 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.2086 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.02 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.25 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 15,866 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 7,093 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 16,815 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 16,857 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 33,672 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Kazakhstan?
- Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Kazakhstan was 19.3% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 40.3% in 2014.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.9% in 2007.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
- Kazakhstan ranks 9th out of 24 countries with data for 2021.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 508.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group