Adequacy of benefits: International … 2nd International urban in Moldova

Moldova: Adequacy of benefits: International … 2nd International urban was 51.6% in 2018. ▬ Flat

Latest (2018)
51.6%
Change on year
down 12.4%
World rank
7th
of 27 countries
All-time high
67.0%
in 2012
All-time low
49.3%
in 2010
Years of data
5
2010–2018

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Moldova, 2010–2018

02040602010201420182010: 49.32012: 672013: 54.12017: 592018: 51.6

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2018, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Moldova stood at 51.6%.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 12.4% on the previous year and up 4.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Moldova peaked at 67.0% in 2012 and was at its lowest, 49.3%, in 2010.

That places Moldova 7th out of 27 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the top quarter.

Adequacy of benefits: International … 2nd International urban in Moldova, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban in Moldova, 2010 to 2018.
Year Value Change
2010 49.3% —
2012 67.0% +36.0%
2013 54.1% -19.3%
2017 59.0% +9.0%
2018 51.6% -12.4%

Moldova compared with similar countries

  • Moldova's 51.6% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 59.4%, 87% of the median. (8 countries reporting)
  • Moldova's 51.6% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 34.2%, 1.5× the median. (17 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Moldova

  1. 4 Georgia 67.1% compare
  2. 5 Mongolia 57.9% compare
  3. 6 South Africa 52.7%
  4. 8 Pakistan 48.6% compare
  5. 9 Vietnam 48.4% compare
  6. 10 Kosovo 48.1% compare
  7. 10 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 48.1% compare

See the full ranking of 27 places →

More work & labour data for Moldova

All data for Moldova →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Moldova?
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Moldova was 51.6% in 2018, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private recorded in Moldova?
The highest recorded value was 67.0% in 2012.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private recorded in Moldova?
The lowest recorded value was 49.3% in 2010.
How does Moldova rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
Moldova ranks 7th out of 27 countries with data for 2018.
Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private rising or falling in Moldova?
Over the last ten years it is up 4.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Moldova data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Moldova. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-international-private-transfers-urban/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-international-private-transfers-urban/moldova/">Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Moldova</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
27 places, 259 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group