Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Kosovo

Kosovo: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private was 48.1% in 2017. ▼ Falling

Latest (2017)
48.1%
World rank
10th
of 27 countries
All-time high
77.4%
in 2006
All-time low
33.0%
in 2012
Years of data
5
2006–2017

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Kosovo, 2006–2017

0204060802006201120172006: 77.42011: 74.72012: 332013: 40.52017: 48.1

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2017, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Kosovo stood at 48.1%.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 37.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Kosovo peaked at 77.4% in 2006 and was at its lowest, 33.0%, in 2012.

That places Kosovo 10th out of 27 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the middle of the range.

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Kosovo, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban in Kosovo, 2006 to 2017.
Year Value Change
2006 77.4%
2011 74.7% -3.6%
2012 33.0% -55.8%
2013 40.5% +22.8%
2017 48.1% +18.7%

Kosovo compared with similar countries

  • Kosovo's 48.1% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 59.4%, 81% of the median. (8 countries reporting)
  • Kosovo's 48.1% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 34.2%, 1.4× the median. (17 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 77.4% 77.4% 77.4% 1
2010s 49.1% 33.0% 74.7% 4

Countries ranked near Kosovo

  1. 7 Republic of Moldova 51.6% compare
  2. 8 Pakistan 48.6% compare
  3. 9 Viet Nam 48.4% compare
  4. 10 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 48.1% compare
  5. 12 Sri Lanka 35.6% compare
  6. 13 Serbia 34.2% compare

See the full ranking of 27 places →

More work & labour data for Kosovo

All data for Kosovo →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Kosovo?
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Kosovo was 48.1% in 2017, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private recorded in Kosovo?
The highest recorded value was 77.4% in 2006.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private recorded in Kosovo?
The lowest recorded value was 33.0% in 2012.
How does Kosovo rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
Kosovo ranks 10th out of 27 countries with data for 2017.
Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private rising or falling in Kosovo?
Over the last ten years it is down 37.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Kosovo data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Kosovo. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-international-private-transfers-urban/kosovo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-international-private-transfers-urban/kosovo/">Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Kosovo</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
27 places, 259 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group