Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in South Africa

South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private was 49.5% in 2021. ▲ Rising

Latest (2021)
49.5%
Change on year
down 2.9%
World rank
11th
of 27 countries
All-time high
54.7%
in 2019
All-time low
47.3%
in 2016
Years of data
5
2016–2021

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in South Africa, 2016–2021

02040602016201820212016: 47.3 preT2018: 47.4 preT2019: 54.7 preT2020: 51 preT2021: 49.5 preT

Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.

Analysis

South Africa recorded 49.5% for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in 2021.

That represents a change of down 2.9% on the previous year and up 4.7% over ten years.

That places South Africa 11th out of 27 countries with data for 2021, putting it in the middle of the range.

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in South Africa, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers (preT) in South Africa, 2016 to 2021.
Year preT Change
2016 47.3%
2018 47.4% +0.2%
2019 54.7% +15.5%
2020 51.0% -6.7%
2021 49.5% -2.9%

South Africa compared with similar countries

  • South Africa's 49.5% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 44.1%, 1.1× the median. (17 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 49.8% 47.3% 54.7% 3
2020s 50.3% 49.5% 51.0% 2

Countries ranked near South Africa

  1. 8 Pakistan 53.4%
  2. 9 Kosovo 53.3%
  3. 9 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 53.3%
  4. 12 Ecuador 45.5% compare
  5. 13 Georgia 44.1% compare
  6. 14 Sri Lanka 42.7%

See the full ranking of 27 places →

More work & labour data for South Africa

All data for South Africa →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in South Africa?
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in South Africa was 49.5% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private recorded in South Africa?
The highest recorded value was 54.7% in 2019.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private recorded in South Africa?
The lowest recorded value was 47.3% in 2016.
How does South Africa rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
South Africa ranks 11th out of 27 countries with data for 2021.
Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private rising or falling in South Africa?
Over the last ten years it is up 4.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this South Africa data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in South Africa. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-international-private-transfers-pret/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-international-private-transfers-pret/south-africa/">Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in South Africa</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers (preT)
Unit
preT
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
27 places, 266 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group