Georgia vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private
Georgia
44.1%
in 2021
South Africa
49.5%
in 2021
Georgia rank
13th
South Africa rank
11th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Georgia
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 49.5% against 44.1% in Georgia, a difference of 5.4%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 13th and South Africa ranks 11th of 27 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 50.5% | 49.8% | 0.7% | Georgia |
| 2020s | 50.2% | 50.3% | 0.1% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private, Georgia or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 49.5% against 44.1% in Georgia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private between Georgia and South Africa?
- 5.4%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Georgia and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
- Georgia ranks 13th and South Africa ranks 11th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group