Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Georgia
Georgia: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers was 19.7% in 2021. ◆ Volatile
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Georgia, 2011–2021
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
In 2021, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Georgia stood at 19.7%.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 6.8% on the previous year and down 93.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Georgia peaked at 292.9% in 2011 and was at its lowest, 15.9%, in 2014.
Georgia ranks 17th of 31 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Georgia, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 292.9% | — |
| 2012 | 23.3% | -92.1% |
| 2013 | 21.3% | -8.5% |
| 2014 | 15.9% | -25.2% |
| 2015 | 18.8% | +18.2% |
| 2016 | 19.9% | +5.9% |
| 2017 | 24.7% | +23.8% |
| 2018 | 25.2% | +2.3% |
| 2019 | 25.1% | -0.7% |
| 2020 | 18.4% | -26.4% |
| 2021 | 19.7% | +6.8% |
Georgia compared with similar countries
- Georgia's 19.7% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 28.4%, 69% of the median. (9 countries reporting)
- Georgia's 19.7% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 19.9%, 99% of the median. (19 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 51.9% | 15.9% | 292.9% | 9 |
| 2020s | 19.1% | 18.4% | 19.7% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Georgia
More work & labour data for Georgia
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.5749 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.5695 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.5795 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.16 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.0234 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 2,483 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 911.09 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 1,505 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 1,465 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 2,969 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Georgia?
- Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Georgia was 19.7% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Georgia?
- The highest recorded value was 292.9% in 2011.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Georgia?
- The lowest recorded value was 15.9% in 2014.
- How does Georgia rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers?
- Georgia ranks 17th out of 31 countries with data for 2021.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers rising or falling in Georgia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 93.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Georgia data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group