Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Argentina
Argentina: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers was 19.9% in 2022. ▼ Falling
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Argentina, 2006–2022
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
In 2022, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Argentina stood at 19.9%.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 16.1% on the previous year and down 31.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Argentina peaked at 34.6% in 2006 and was at its lowest, 7.2%, in 2016.
That places Argentina 16th out of 31 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 10 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Argentina, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 34.6% | — |
| 2010 | 32.6% | -5.6% |
| 2013 | 28.8% | -11.6% |
| 2016 | 7.2% | -75.0% |
| 2017 | 19.5% | +170.3% |
| 2018 | 23.0% | +17.7% |
| 2019 | 20.6% | -10.3% |
| 2020 | 18.3% | -11.1% |
| 2021 | 23.7% | +29.3% |
| 2022 | 19.9% | -16.1% |
Argentina compared with similar countries
- Argentina's 19.9% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 19.9%, 1.0× the median. (19 countries reporting)
- Argentina's 19.9% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 19.2%, 1.0× the median. (15 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.6% | 34.6% | 34.6% | 1 |
| 2010s | 22.0% | 7.2% | 32.6% | 6 |
| 2020s | 20.6% | 18.3% | 23.7% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Argentina
More work & labour data for Argentina
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.7783 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.7715 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.7851 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.514 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 52,564 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 2,664 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 19,145 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 19,111 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 38,256 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Argentina?
- Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Argentina was 19.9% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Argentina?
- The highest recorded value was 34.6% in 2006.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Argentina?
- The lowest recorded value was 7.2% in 2016.
- How does Argentina rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers?
- Argentina ranks 16th out of 31 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers rising or falling in Argentina?
- Over the last ten years it is down 31.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Argentina data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group