Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Belarus
Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and was 63.9% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Belarus recorded 63.9% for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and in 2019.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.3% on the previous year and up 38.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Belarus peaked at 98.1% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 43.3%, in 2008.
Belarus ranks 4th of 37 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Belarus, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 43.3% | — |
| 2009 | 46.1% | +6.5% |
| 2010 | 46.7% | +1.2% |
| 2012 | 51.1% | +9.3% |
| 2013 | 63.4% | +24.3% |
| 2014 | 62.5% | -1.4% |
| 2015 | 67.3% | +7.6% |
| 2016 | 98.1% | +45.8% |
| 2017 | 68.1% | -30.5% |
| 2018 | 63.7% | -6.5% |
| 2019 | 63.9% | +0.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.7% | 43.3% | 46.1% | 2 |
| 2010s | 65.0% | 46.7% | 98.1% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More work & labour data for Belarus
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.12 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.18 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.98 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0716 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 7,566 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,004 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,235 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,116 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 4,351 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Belarus?
- Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Belarus was 63.9% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 98.1% in 2016.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 43.3% in 2008.
- How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and?
- Belarus ranks 4th out of 37 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 38.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group