Belarus vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and
Belarus
63.9%
in 2019
South Africa
64.7%
in 2021
Belarus rank
4th
South Africa rank
3rd
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and over time
- Belarus
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 64.7% against 63.9% in Belarus, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 4th and South Africa ranks 3rd of 37 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and, Belarus or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 64.7% against 63.9% in Belarus as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and between Belarus and South Africa?
- 0.8%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and?
- Belarus ranks 4th and South Africa ranks 3rd of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group