Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Poland
Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural was 78.1% in 2019. ▬ Flat
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Poland, 2005–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2019, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Poland stood at 78.1%. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.
The figure is up 22.3% on the previous year and up 12.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Poland peaked at 78.1% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 63.9%, in 2017.
That places Poland 4th out of 31 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Poland, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 69.4% | — |
| 2006 | 70.9% | +2.1% |
| 2007 | 71.6% | +1.0% |
| 2008 | 69.2% | -3.4% |
| 2009 | 69.6% | +0.6% |
| 2010 | 70.1% | +0.8% |
| 2011 | 69.1% | -1.3% |
| 2012 | 70.8% | +2.5% |
| 2015 | 68.8% | -2.8% |
| 2016 | 68.9% | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 63.9% | -7.3% |
| 2019 | 78.1% | +22.3% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 78.1% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 58.3%, 1.3× the median. (11 countries reporting)
- Poland's 78.1% is above the median for high income countries, which is 50.7%, 1.5× the median. (6 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.1% | 69.2% | 71.6% | 5 |
| 2010s | 70.0% | 63.9% | 78.1% | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Poland?
- Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Poland was 78.1% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 78.1% in 2019.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 63.9% in 2017.
- How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Poland ranks 4th out of 31 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 12.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group