Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Belarus
Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural was 98.6% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Belarus is 98.6%, measured in 2019.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 12.0% on the previous year and up 16.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Belarus peaked at 101.4% in 2013 and was at its lowest, 81.0%, in 2017.
That places Belarus 2nd out of 31 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Belarus, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 88.9% | — |
| 2009 | 85.0% | -4.3% |
| 2010 | 82.4% | -3.0% |
| 2012 | 81.1% | -1.6% |
| 2013 | 101.4% | +25.1% |
| 2014 | 98.7% | -2.7% |
| 2015 | 89.5% | -9.4% |
| 2016 | 93.9% | +4.9% |
| 2017 | 81.0% | -13.7% |
| 2018 | 88.0% | +8.7% |
| 2019 | 98.6% | +12.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.9% | 85.0% | 88.9% | 2 |
| 2010s | 90.5% | 81.0% | 101.4% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More work & labour data for Belarus
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.12 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.18 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.98 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0716 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 7,566 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,004 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,235 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,116 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 4,351 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Belarus?
- Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Belarus was 98.6% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 101.4% in 2013.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 81.0% in 2017.
- How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Belarus ranks 2nd out of 31 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 16.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group