Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International in Ecuador
Ecuador: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International was 40.8% in 2022. ▼ Falling
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International in Ecuador, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2022, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international in Ecuador stood at 40.8%.
That represents a change of down 17.3% on the previous year and down 16.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international in Ecuador peaked at 49.3% in 2021 and was at its lowest, 22.6%, in 2020.
Ecuador ranks 12th of 27 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 39.5% | — |
| 2010 | 39.8% | +0.8% |
| 2011 | 39.3% | -1.4% |
| 2012 | 48.6% | +23.7% |
| 2014 | 29.1% | -40.1% |
| 2015 | 25.6% | -11.9% |
| 2016 | 34.8% | +35.7% |
| 2017 | 31.4% | -9.6% |
| 2018 | 40.6% | +29.1% |
| 2019 | 35.9% | -11.6% |
| 2020 | 22.6% | -36.9% |
| 2021 | 49.3% | +117.8% |
| 2022 | 40.8% | -17.3% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 40.8% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 35.7%, 1.1× the median. (17 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 40.8% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 25.1%, 1.6× the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.5% | 39.5% | 39.5% | 1 |
| 2010s | 36.1% | 25.6% | 48.6% | 9 |
| 2020s | 37.6% | 22.6% | 49.3% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
More work & labour data for Ecuador
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.578 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.567 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.589 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.04 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.13 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 17,174 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 5,794 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,543 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,549 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,092 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international in Ecuador?
- Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international in Ecuador was 40.8% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 49.3% in 2021.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 22.6% in 2020.
- How does Ecuador rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- Ecuador ranks 12th out of 27 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 16.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group